Title X Contraceptive Access Boundary Map
Geographic distribution of county-level risk inside Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee if Title X funding is removed.
Understanding the Boundary Classification
This spatial boundary map displays the immediate healthcare reality if Title X sub-grants are eliminated. Areas are filled based on the availability of other publicly supported contraceptive providers (e.g. FQHCs, local health departments, hospital outpatient clinics).
Aggregate Exposures
Critical Risk (No public options left)
Moderate Risk (Losing some options)
Boundary Legend
Classifications & Logic
🔴 Critical Risk (Total Loss)
Counties where Title X clinics represent 100% of the publicly funded contraceptive service ecosystem. Discontinuation leaves residents with zero public options.
🟠 Moderate Risk (Access Loss)
Counties with Title X and other public clinics. Removing Title X restricts clinic hours, location choice, and overall regional capacity, but some access remains.
🟢 Stable Public Access
Counties currently relying solely on non-Title X clinics (e.g., standard FQHCs or Local Health Departments). No immediate direct closure risks.
State Risk Exposures
Vulnerable counties (Critical & Moderate) as a share of total counties inside each state.
Policy & Methodological Footnotes
This visual map operates on Guttmacher Registry data compiled from the Title X file verbatim. It lists 467 county subdivisions spanning Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
Calculations filter state health facilities to contrast Title X-funded locations with alternative public programs. County-level boundaries are aligned through FIPS designations, with manual name corrections applied to ensure visual precision.

